Last year at about this time, I wrote a post titled, “Has Anyone Seen Me?” It was about the Dusky-faced Meadow Katydid (Orchelimum
campestre), a wetland species I’d searched
for year after year but had never found in Ohio.
Until just recently - specifically, August 23rd.
I knew there were historical records of this species and it
appears to have been somewhat common in Ohio. However, Ohio has also lost 90%
of its wetlands, and most of what remains is degraded by invasive phragmites and
narrow-leaved cattails.
I’d also written in my post that I thought I’d need
to observe these katydids closely in order to learn about their behavior and where
they live.
Wendy and I had a brief introduction to them at Kingsbury
Wildlife Area in NW Indiana last year. Carl Strang, who has been doing a
22-county Orthoptera survey in NE Illinois/NW Indiana for years, was our guide
when we visited his area last Labor Day weekend. He knew right where to go
to find them.
This year, the three of us were joined by Wil Hershberger,
co-author with Lang Elliott of The Songs of Insects, for a 5-day exploration of
Carl’s area and the crickets and katydids he has found in his region. It was a
fascinating trip with companionship as excellent as the insects we found. As Wendy
and I headed back to NE Ohio, I felt I was in a stronger position to
search for additional singing insects that might possibly be in our area.
It was clear that the first thing I’d need to do is search
wetlands that still had native plants, and I’d need to wade out into the water.
Since I’m studying the crickets and katydids at Bath Nature Preserve in Summit
County this year, I promptly headed for one of the ponds within a couple of days
after returning home.
The Garden Pond is not invasive-free, but there’s lots of
arrowhead at the edge of the water with other
native plants as well.
I started wading into the arrowhead, periodically
checking the tops of my rubber boots. I thought I heard a pattern of tics and
whirrs that was different from the typical boisterous Black-legged Meadow
Katydids that seem to inhabit any damp or wet area in NE Ohio.
I looked down at
my boots: water ½” from the top…
...and there in the arrowhead was a Dusky-faced Meadow
Katydid! And then another!
My dilemma, as always, was: record first, or photograph
first?
But it wasn’t a problem, as they weren’t going anywhere.
These katydids were surprisingly tolerant of my standing in their marsh. Of
course, I couldn’t move very quickly, either, as it was dark and my preference
was not to fill my boots with water or get stuck in the mucky bottom of the
pond.
So I remained relatively stationary, watching and listening.
Eventually I saw a few more of them. When I slowly moved to the other side of
the pond, I found three or four more – but only when I had waded out into at
least a few inches of water.
I was delighted!
As I wrote last year, their songs are indeed quite loud. It
just doesn’t seem that way because the frequency is so very high for human ears.
My recorder shot into the red zone, yet my perception was simply that I could
hear this katydid better than I thought I would. I couldn’t back up very well,
as I was rather embedded in mud by now, so I quickly pulled back my microphone
until I could adjust the input level.
I could later see that the song was well over 15 kHz (that’s 15,000 Hz, and the threshold of human hearing is about 20,000 for young ears). Wil confirmed for me that the peak frequencies of the Dusky-faced he recorded were 16.3 -17.7 kHz.
The pattern of "tics" is irregular, and the "whirrs" (or trills) are of varying lengths. Here's another example from Garden Pond.
When I returned the next night, my initial little group now
had six individuals, all on arrowhead. When they jumped, I could hear the sound
of their feet hitting the tough, thick leaves. They not only perched on these leaves
and stems, but were eating the leaves as well.
One of the females hopped from a leaf right onto my hand as
I was recording a singing male. Perhaps she remembered how much she’d enjoyed
nibbling on my skin during our photo shoot the night before.
Katydids do like
to nibble on human skin, but it’s usually just the lightest tickle. Not with this girl, though. I guess it takes more power to
chew that tough arrowhead, and I felt sharp little pinches up and down my arms
and hands as she explored and I recorded. Did I care? Absolutely not!
I visited the pond three times that week, watching their
behavior, noting what plants they were on and how close to the water they
stayed, and also observing how dusky their dusky faces were or were not.
There was considerable variation. Some are much darker
reddish-tan while others are light tan to almost green. All have interesting
wavy lines and spots that remind me of capillaries. Here are some of their faces:
The cerci are bright yellow, and the wings are brown and
quite long. Their eyes are tan with a touch of orange, unlike the bright, red
eyes of the Common Meadow Katydids, and their legs are green with a little
brown toward the back.
Compare their subtle shades to the yellow and black legs of this colorful Black-legged
Meadow Katydid (Orchelimum nigripes) I found at the same location (photo below).
Katydids in the genus Orchelimum are larger than those in
the genus Conocephalus, which includeds our very common Short-winged Meadow
Katydids and Slender Meadow Katydids. The Dusky-faced Meadow Katydids seem
comparatively substantial even to some of the other Orchelimum members, perhaps in part because they stay
calmly in place rather than rapidly leaping from leaf to stem to somewhere out
of sight.
They are uncommon, relatively inaccessible, elegant, and - fortunately for me - tolerant
of respectful humans.
This past week, I checked the Garden Bowl wetland, also
at Bath Nature Preserve. The preserve had previously been the Raymond Firestone estate before its purchase by Bath Township in 1997, and the wetland was drained in the 1930s for use as a polo field. How excellent that this wetland has recently been gloriously restored! (You can read about the process here.)
I wondered if there was any possibility that it might have had a remnant population from before the destruction. I wasn’t too hopeful, but the area is now quite gorgeous with all its native plants, water, and wildlife. Why not go down right to the water and check? I could see there was arrowhead there, too…
I wondered if there was any possibility that it might have had a remnant population from before the destruction. I wasn’t too hopeful, but the area is now quite gorgeous with all its native plants, water, and wildlife. Why not go down right to the water and check? I could see there was arrowhead there, too…
I searched at dusk, and didn’t find any. I waited for
darkness, and continued to search. And then – there was a Dusky-faced!
I found
a second one shortly thereafter. I imagine there were more, but I couldn’t
guarantee that I wouldn’t lose my boots in the mud below the water.
But how exciting! Had they been there all along? Did they
somehow move in from the Garden Pond? Are there more out at the much larger
Bath Pond in areas that are not accessible?
And maybe, just maybe I’ll find them in other northern Ohio
wetlands as well. I now have a better idea of how and where to search. Perhaps I’ll even
find one of the other even less common katydid species I have yet to find in Ohio. That’s where I’ll leave
the story for now, but you know it will be continued next August!
Well done!!
ReplyDeleteMy back yard is full of arrowhead, and I have recorded some 15K singers there. Their song does not have the long period of spaced ticks, however. I will get in there and look around for whoever is there. Excellent story, Lisa - Brad Bolton
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDelete